Wednesday, December 19, 2007

Does the Romance Genre Need a Make Over?

Another great post over at Dear Author wherein Jane wonders if a makeover would get the Romance genre a little respect from the mainstream.

Now, I hate mantitty, secret babies and clinch covers as much as the next gal-who-also-likes-to-occasionally-read- in-public-or-on-the-bus, but not even a tag team of Oprah, Tyra and Ty Pennington could spruce up the genre enough to get it an invite to the Mystery/Sci-Fi/We're almost literature Prom.

It's not that I'm down on Romance. You know I'm not. Thing is, Harlequin's many secret babies, Fabio dressed up like a metrosexual Indian, and those clinches that defy the the limits of human flexibility--they sell. And since they sell, they aren't going anywhere--not unless those of us who hate them rip off those cute calico "bookcovers" we bought at the last garage sale our romance-reading 80-year-old neighbor had (the one where she tried to sell you a whole box of Cassie Edwards novels for $0.50) and stop buying books with covers we hate.

And since I am not about to forgo one of my favorite genres for 3-5 years just to make publishers change their ways, I will suggest that those of us who would like to class up the look of our reading material give up on lifting all boats with a rising tide of respectability and focus our attention on the well-crafted vessels that aren't weighed down by the claptrap and cliche for which our beloved genre is (somewhat justifiably) mocked.

In the comments at Dear Author, I suggested that the Romance genre follow in the footsteps of comic books--er-hem, graphic novels--and think up a new name for books that aspire to a more artistic level. Comic books were long reviled as thinly-plotted, tawdry niche-market geek-boy fantasies. There were plenty of good--great--comics out there, like Love and Rockets or The Watchmen, but they never got any respect because they shared shelf space in dingy, geek-filled little stores with the afore-mentioned tawdry niche-market geek-boy fantasies. And then some clever person decided to christen the good stuff "graphc novels" and the rest, you know, is history.

So here's my question: What do we call our classier, more literary-leaning subgenre of Romance novel? And how do we make it stick?

5 comments:

Carrie Lofty said...

I just read my first Nora book last night. Secret baby Christmas story from 1986. I got weepy. Dude, serious tears welling in my eyes! What is WRONG with me?? There's no saving a genre that's populated by so many hormones at cross purposes with our brains! Agh!

Carolyn Jean said...

A new name! That is such a smart idea. To myself, I sort of think of the whole genre as "girls' thrill and adventure books" though I don't think that's quite right for a name. I will try and think of some ideas during the boring meeting I'm about to leave for!

Carolyn Jean said...

PS
I actually sort of like that cover.

bettie said...

"girls' thrill and adventure books" Awesome!

To be honest, I can't even say that I would want to belong to this new, classy subgenre. Fact is, I like unabashed genre fiction and some of my favorite types of genre fiction have been vilified in the same way as Romance. Example: Hard-boiled detective novels. They used to have those great pulpy covers. They used to scare parents silly. They used to be full of violence, sex, and moral ambiguity. And then Raymond Chandler had to go and try to class the genre up. Not that I'm down on Chandler, but I will take Hammet's morally flexible, namless, straightforward Continental Op over the noble-ish Phillip Marlowe any day.

Also, I am heartily sick of this new breed of historical romance that uses an old-looking painting of a woman as the cover pic, and carries the words "A Novel" beneath the title. The Art History lady is a step up from Fabio's flowing locks and denuded pecs (sorry, Carolyn Jean ;o), but as a style, it's pretentious. Perhaps I want the impossible.

Kate Willoughby said...

I don't think a new name would help. Graphic novels are made popular now, I think, because of the movie industry milking it for screenplays. Plus, they're mainly PICTURES which appeals to teen pseudo-readers who have a lot of discretionary income, or just read them cover to cover in the bookstore (clogging up the aisles, I might add.)

And, I have to mention that I must have READ that Savage Thunder book because it looks SO familiar!